Re: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:50:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <1156371783.15743.157.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <1156371783.15743.157.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:23:03PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:

Also, do ext2 or UFS without soft updates run the risk of losing or
corrupting my data?

I suggest you check the list archives; there's a lot of stuff aboutfilesystems and disk configuration in there.


Mike Stone

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
  - From: Jeff Davis

References:
- Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
  - From: Jeff Davis

Prev by Date: Re: Query tuning
Next by Date: Re: Forcing index usage without 'enable_hashjoin = FALSE'
Previous by thread: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
Next by thread: Re: Which benchmark to use for testing FS?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Postgresql General] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP Users] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux