Maybe I mis-stated, this is a 6-disk array.
Steve
On 8/7/06, Alex Turner <armtuk@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
These number are pretty darn good for a four disk RAID 10, pretty close to perfect infact. Nice advert for the 642 - I guess we have a Hardware RAID controller than will read indpendently from mirrors.
Alex
On 8/8/06, Steve Poe < steve.poe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Luke,
Here are the results of two runs of 16GB file tests on XFS.
scsi disc array
xfs ,16G,81024,99,153016,24,73422,10,82092,97,243210,17,1043.1,0,16,3172,7,+++++,+++,2957,9,3197,10,+++++,+++,2484,8
scsi disc array
xfs ,16G,83320,99,155641,25,73662,10,81756,96,243352,18,1029.1,0,16,3119,10,+++++,+++,2789,7,3263,11,+++++,+++,2014,6
Thanks.
Steve
> Can you run bonnie++ version 1.03a on the machine and report the results
> here?
>
> It could be OK if you have the latest Linux driver for cciss, someone has
> reported good results to this list with the latest, bleeding edge version of
> Linux (2.6.17).
>
> - Luke
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
