denisl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("Denis Lussier") writes:
> I have no personal experience with XFS, but, I've seen numerous
> internal edb-postgres test results that show that of all file
> systems... OCFS 2.0 seems to be quite good for PG update intensive
> apps (especially on 64 bit machines).
I have been curious about OCFS for some time; it sounded like a case
where there could possibly be some useful semantic changes to
filesystem functionality, notably that:
- atime is pretty irrelevant;
- it might try to work with pretty fixed block sizes (8K, perhaps?)
rather than try to be efficient at handling tiny files
It sounds like it ought to be able to be a good fit.
Of course, with a big warning sticker of "what is required for Oracle
to work properly is implemented, anything more is not a guarantee" on
it, who's going to trust it?
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'cbbrowne.com';
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/oses.html
"There isn't any reason why Linux can't be implemented as an
enterprise computing solution. Find out what you've been missing
while you've been rebooting Windows NT." - Infoworld
