Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vivek,

Thanks for your feedback.  Which Dell server did you purchase?  

The client has a PowerEdge 2600 and they STILL want Dell. Again, if it
were my pocketbook, Dell would not be there. 

The client has a 30GB DB. This is large for me, but probably not with
you. Also, I am advising the client to go to a 10+ disc array (from 3)
and enough RAM to load half the DB into memory. 

Steve




On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 12:22 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Steve Poe wrote:
> 
> >
> > Can anyone share what their experience has been with Intel's dual core
> > CPUs and/or Dell's new servers?
> 
> I'm one of the few Dell fans around here... but I must say that I  
> don't buy them for my big DB servers specifically since they don't  
> currently ship Opteron based systems.  (I did call and thank my sales  
> rep for pushing my case for them to do Opterons, though, since I'm  
> sure they are doing it as a personal favor to me :-) )
> 
> I just put up a pentium-D dual-core based system and it is pretty  
> wickedly fast.  it only has a pair of SATA drives on it and is used  
> for pre-production testing.
> 
> >
> > I am hoping the client is willing to wait for Dell to ship a AMD
> > Opeteron-based server.
> 
> Don't wait.  It will be *months* before that happens. Go get a Sun  
> X4100 and an external RAID array and be happy.  These boxes are an  
> amazing work of engineering.
> 



[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux