On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:14:26AM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 14 Jun 2006 23:33:53 -0400, Greg Stark <gsstark@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >In fact the benefit of the NVRAM is precisely that it makes sure you > >*don't* > >have any reason to turn fsync off. It should make the fsync essentially > >free. > > Having run PostgreSQL on a NetApp with input from NetApp, this is > correct. fsync should be turned on, but you will not incur the *real* > direct-to-disk cost of the sync, it will be direct-to-NVRAM. Just so there's no confusion... this applies to any caching RAID controller as well. You just need to ensure that the cache in the controller absolutely will not be lost in the event of a power failure or what-have-you. On most controllers this is accomplished with a simple battery backup; I don't know if the higher-end stuff takes further steps (such as flashing the cache contents to flash memory on a power failure). -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
