Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:21:34PM -0700, Mischa Sandberg wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> ...
> >Actually, in 8.1.x I've seen some big wins from greatly increasing the
> >amount of shared_buffers, even as high as 50% of memory, thanks to the
> >changes made to the buffer management code. ...
> 
> Anyone else run into a gotcha that one of our customers ran into?
> PG 7.4.8 running on Solaris 2.6, USparc w 4GB RAM.
> Usually about 50 active backends.
> (No reason to believe this wouldn't apply to 8.x).
> 
> Initially shared_buffers were set to 1000 (8MB).
> Then, we moved all apps but the database server off the box.
> 
> Raised shared_buffers to 2000 (16MB).
> Modest improvement in some frequent repeated queries.
> 
> Raised shared_buffers to 16000 (128MB).
> DB server dropped to a CRAWL.
> 
> vmstat showed that it was swapping like crazy.
> Dropped shared_buffers back down again. 
> Swapping stopped.

What's sort_mem set to? I suspect you simply ran the machine out of
memory.

Also, Solaris by default will only use a portion of memory for
filesystem caching, which will kill PostgreSQL performance.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux