Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: mischa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
From: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:22:07 -0400
Cc: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Comments: In-reply-to Mischa Sandberg <mischa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> message dated "Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:21:34 -0700"
In-reply-to: <448F3A6E.6080908@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1150151282.14661.42.camel@tigger> <20060613000441.GI8588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060613200810.GZ34196@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <448F3A6E.6080908@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Mischa Sandberg <mischa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> vmstat showed that it was swapping like crazy.
> Dropped shared_buffers back down again. 
> Swapping stopped.

Does Solaris have any call that allows locking a shmem segment in RAM?

			regards, tom lane

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
  - From: Mischa Sandberg
- Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
  - From: Michael Fuhr

References:
- 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
  - From: Anthony Presley
- Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
  - From: Stephen Frost
- Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
  - From: Jim C. Nasby
- Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
  - From: Mischa Sandberg

Prev by Date: Re: scaling up postgres
Next by Date: Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
Previous by thread: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
Next by thread: Re: Solaris shared_buffers anomaly?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Postgresql General] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP Users] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux