Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Something else worth considering is not using the normal 
> catalog methods
> for storing information about temp tables, but hacking that together
> would probably be a rather large task.

But the timings suggest, that it cannot be the catalogs in the worst
case
he showed.

> 0.101 ms BEGIN
> 1.451 ms CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tmp ( a INTEGER NOT NULL, b INTEGER
NOT  
> NULL, c TIMESTAMP NOT NULL, d INTEGER NOT NULL ) ON COMMIT DROP

1.4 seconds is not great for create table, is that what we expect ?

> 0.450 ms INSERT INTO tmp SELECT * FROM bookmarks ORDER BY annonce_id
DESC  
> LIMIT 20
> 0.443 ms ANALYZE tmp
> 0.365 ms SELECT * FROM tmp
> 0.310 ms DROP TABLE tmp
> 32.918 ms COMMIT
> 
> 	CREATING the table is OK, but what happens on COMMIT ? I hear
the disk  
> seeking frantically.

The 32 seconds for commit can hardly be catalog related. It seems the
file is 
fsynced before it is dropped.

Andreas


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux