Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey.tenny@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The server was already running with random_page_cost=2 today for all tests, because of > the mods I've made to improve other problem queries in the past (my settings noted below, and > before in another msg on this topic). > So to nail this particular query something additional is required (even lower random_page_cost?). > What's a good value for slower processors/memory and database in memory? If you're pretty sure the database will always be RAM-resident, then 1.0 is the theoretically correct value. regards, tom lane
