Re: bad performance on Solaris 10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Alvaro,
> 
> On 4/5/06 2:48 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This essentially means stopping all bgwriter activity, thereby deferring
> > all I/O until checkpoint.  Was this considered?  With
> > checkpoint_segments to 128, it wouldn't surprise me that there wasn't
> > any checkpoint executed at all during the whole test ...
> 
> Yes, many things about the Solaris UFS filesystem caused a great deal of
> pain over the 10 months of experiments we ran with Sun MDE.  Ultimately, the
> conclusion was that ZFS is going to make all of the pain go away.
> 
> In the meantime, all you can do is tweak up UFS and avoid I/O as much as
> possible.

It is hard to imagine why people spend so much time modifying Sun
machines run with acceptable performance when non-Sun operating systems
work fine without such hurtles.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux