Is there some other unique key you can test on? Take a look at http://lnk.nu/cvs.distributed.net/8qt.sql lines 169-216 for an exammple. In this case we use a different method for assigning IDs than you probably will, but the idea remains. On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:59:49AM -0500, ashah wrote: > I tried this solution, but ran into following problem. > > The temp_table has columns (col1, col2, col3). > > The original_table has columns (col0, col1, col2, col3) > > Now the extra col0 on the original_table is the unique generated ID by the > database. > > How can I make your suggestions work in that case .. ? > > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 11:09 am, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > Load the files into a temp table and go from there... > > > > COPY ... FROM file; > > UPDATE existing_table SET ... WHERE ...; > > INSERT INTO existing_table SELECT * FROM temp_table WHERE NOT EXISTS( > > SELECT * FROM existing_table WHERE ...) > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:32:10AM -0500, ashah wrote: > > > I have a database with foreign keys enabled on the schema. I receive > > > different files, some of them are huge. And I need to load these files in > > > the database every night. There are several scenerios that I want to > > > design an optimal solution for - > > > > > > 1. One of the file has around 80K records and I have to delete everything > > > from the table and load this file. The provider never provides a "delta > > > file" so I dont have a way to identify which records are already present > > > and which are new. If I dont delete everything and insert fresh, I have > > > to make around 80K selects to decide if the records exist or not. Now > > > there are lot of tables that have foreign keys linked with this table so > > > unless I disable the foreign keys, I cannot really delete anything from > > > this table. What would be a good practise here? > > > > > > 2. Another file that I receive has around 150K records that I need to > > > load in the database. Now one of the fields is logically a "foreign key" > > > to another table, and it is linked to the parent table via a database > > > generated unique ID instead of the actual value. But the file comes with > > > the actual value. So once again, I have to either drop the foreign key, > > > or make 150K selects to determine the serial ID so that the foreign key > > > is satisfied. What would be a good strategy in this scenerio ? > > > > > > Please pardon my inexperience with database ! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Amit > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
