On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:51:35PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Mark Kirkwood wrote: > > > >I think Freebsd 'Inactive' corresponds pretty closely to Linux's > >'Inactive Dirty'|'Inactive Laundered'|'Inactive Free'. > > > > Hmmm - on second thoughts I think I've got that wrong :-(, since in > Linux all the file buffer pages appear in 'Cached' don't they... > > (I also notice that 'Inactive Laundered' does not seem to be mentioned > in vanilla - read non-Redhat - 2.6 kernels) > > So I think its more correct to say Freebsd 'Inactive' is similar to > Linux 'Inactive' + some|most of Linux 'Cached'. > > A good discussion of how the Freebsd vm works is here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/vm.html > > In particular: > > "FreeBSD reserves a limited amount of KVM to hold mappings from struct > bufs, but it should be made clear that this KVM is used solely to hold > mappings and does not limit the ability to cache data." It's worth noting that starting in either 2.4 or 2.6, linux pretty much adopted the FreeBSD VM system (or so I've been told). -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
