Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum

[Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:50:38PM +0100, Michael Riess wrote:
> about the FSM: You say that increasing the FSM is fairly cheap - how 
> should I know that?

Why would you assume otherwise, to the point of not considering changing
the setting? 

The documentation explains how much memory is used for FSM entries. If
you look at vacuum verbose output it will tell you how much memory
you're currently using for the FSM.

Mike Stone