Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
From: "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:22:36 -0600
Cc: Richard_D_Levine@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Juan Casero <caseroj@xxxxxxxxxxx>, pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pgsql-performance-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43A83D77.4030205@xxxxxxx>
References: <OF464C8019.B4D88FCD-ON052570DD.0054DA15-052570DD.005C8BB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43A83D77.4030205@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:20:55PM -0500, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> Is pgbench the workload that you prefer? (It already has issues with 
> pg_xlog so my guess is it probably won't scale much)
> If you have other workload informations let me know.

References:
- Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
  - From: Richard_D_Levine
- Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
  - From: Jignesh K. Shah

Prev by Date: Re: make bulk deletes faster?
Next by Date: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
Previous by thread: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Postgresql General] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP Users] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux