Jignesh, On 12/19/05 12:21 PM, "Jignesh Shah" <J.K.Shah@xxxxxxx> wrote: > extended device statistics > r/s w/s Mr/s Mw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device > 0.8 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 17.8 0 4 c3t0d0 > 91.4 0.0 91.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 10.5 0 96 c0t40d0 > 96.0 0.0 96.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 10.0 0 96 c5t40d1 > 95.8 0.0 95.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 10.0 0 96 c0t40d1 > 96.8 0.0 96.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 9.9 0 96 c5t40d0 > 84.6 0.0 84.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 11.4 0 96 c4t46d1 > 85.6 0.0 85.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 11.2 0 96 c4t46d0 > 85.2 0.0 85.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 11.3 0 96 c2t46d1 > 85.4 0.0 85.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 11.3 0 96 c2t46d0 Doh! Forget my last message, each of these is a single drive. Wacky layout though - it looks like c0,c2,c3,c4,c5 - is that 5 controllers there? Also - what are the RAID options on this unit? To get optimal performance on an 8 core unit, would we want to map 1 active process to each of these drives? Can the CPU run all 8 threads simultaneously? - Luke
