Ron <rjpeace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Agreed. Also the odds of fs corruption or data loss are higher in a > non journaling fs. Best practice seems to be to use a journaling fs > but to put the fs log on dedicated spindles separate from the actual > fs or pg_xlog. I think we've determined that best practice is to journal metadata only (not file contents) on PG data filesystems. PG does expect the filesystem to remember where the files are, so you need metadata protection, but journalling file content updates is redundant with PG's own WAL logging. On a filesystem dedicated to WAL, you probably do not need any filesystem journalling at all --- we manage the WAL files in a way that avoids changing metadata for a WAL file that's in active use. A conservative approach would be to journal metadata here too, though. regards, tom lane
