> > Sorry, I don't follow you here - what do you mean to do? Remove the > > event completely so we can't wait on it? > > > > I'd like to use the win32 provided recv(), send() functions > instead of redirect them to pgwin32_recv()/pgwin32_send(), > just like libpq does. If we do this, we will lose some > functionalities, but I'd like to see the performance > difference first. -- do you think that will be any difference? Doesn't work, really. It will no longer be possible to send a signal to an idle backend. The idle backend will be blocking on recv(), that's how it works. So unless we can get around that somehow, it's a non-starter I think. I doubt there will be much performance difference, as you hav eto hit the kernel anyway (in the recv/send call). But that part is just a guess :-) //Magnus
