Re: Better Hardware, worst Results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Rod Taylor <pg@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
From: Matt Clark <matt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 23:08:59 +0000
Cc: al_nunes@xxxxxxxxxxx, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1099609109.1647.727.camel@home>
References: <1099602361.7775.15.camel@localhost> <1099602998.1647.711.camel@home> <1099608123.418ab03ba292f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1099609109.1647.727.camel@home>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

All 3 plans have crappy estimates.

Run ANALYZE in production, then send another explain analyze (as an
attachment please, to avoid linewrap).

Er, no other possible answer except Rod's :-)

References:
- Better Hardware, worst Results
  - From: Alvaro Nunes Melo
- Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
  - From: Rod Taylor
- Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
  - From: al_nunes
- Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
  - From: Rod Taylor

Prev by Date: Re: Restricting Postgres
Next by Date: Re: Restricting Postgres
Previous by thread: Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
Next by thread: Re: Better Hardware, worst Results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Postgresql General] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP Users] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux