Re: Postgresql Database and PG_WAL locations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 15:02 -0400, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 2:22 PM Matthew Tice <mjtice@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Aug 29, 2024, at 12:18 PM, Henry Ashu <henry.ashu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I have a database that's about 2TB in size, and I want to place the database
> > > files in a separate mount point(PGDATA) and the log files in a different mount
> > > point(PG_WAL). What's your take on this?.
> > 
> > 
> > Take a look at https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Installation_and_Administration_Best_practices
> > 
> > Essentially, yes, you will want your WAL and data stored on different devices
> > (or the very least, different partitions).
> 
> Is that recommendation still valid?  After all, that was written when 15 years old
> Sun Studio 12 was still pertinent.  Times have changed since then.  Disks are much, much bigger.

I think the advice is still valid.

Today you'd have different filesystems on different logical volumes rather
than different physical disks, but it is still a good idea to separate data and WAL,
so that they cannot fill up each other's file system.

I'd actually define a third file system for the PostgreSQL log files, for
the same reason.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe






[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Home]     [Postgresql General]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Postgresql PHP]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Databases]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux