Re: checking for a NULL date in a partitioned table kills performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Aug 22, 2024, at 5:44 PM, Sbob <sbob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> All;
> 
> I am running a select from a partitioned table. The table (and all the partitions) have an index on contract_date like this:
> CREATE INDEX on part_tab (contract_date) where contract_date > '2022-01-01'::date
> 
> The table (including all partitions) has 32million rows
> The db server is an aurora postgresql instance with 128GB of ram and 16 vcpu's
> 
> The shared buffers is set to 90GB and effective_cache_size is also 90GB
> I set default_statistics_target to 1000 and ram a vacuum analyze on the table
> 
> I am selecting a number of columns and specifying this where clause:
> 
> WHERE (
>                     (contract_date IS NULL)
>                     OR
>                     (contract_date > '2022-01-01'::date)
>              )
> 
> This takes 15 seconds to run and an explain says it's doing a table scan on all partitions (the query is not specifying the partition key)
> If I change the where clause to look like this:
> 
> WHERE (
>                   (contract_date > '2022-01-01'::date)
>              )
> 
> Then it performs index scans on all the partitions and runs in about 600ms
> 
> If i leave the where clause off entirely it performs table scans of the partitions and takes approx 18 seconds to run
> 
> I am trying to get the performance to less than 2sec,
> I have tried adding indexes on the table and all partitions like this:
> CREATE INDEX ON table (contract_date NULLS FIRST) ;
> but the performance with the full where clause is the same:
> 
> WHERE (
>                     (contract_date IS NULL)
>                     OR
>                     (contract_date > '2022-01-01'::date)
>              )
> 
> runs in 15 seconds and scans all partitions
> 
> I also tried indexes i=on the table and all partitions like this:
> CREATE INDEX ON table (contract_date) WHERE contract_date IS NULL;
> 
> but I get the same result, table scans on all partitions and it runs in 15 seconds
> 
> Any help or advice ?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> 

What is contract_date and when will it be null?





[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Home]     [Postgresql General]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Postgresql PHP]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Databases]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux