Is scheduling pg_repack just a bad idea and just introducing just more bloat? Why not just tune auto vacuum? 80/20 rule… most schemas are going to have their large/hot tables, etc and data has a natural life cycle. If you have a heathy application then bloat is not an issue as free space is used by new tuples. Each database has a data flow to it depending on the maturity and nature of the application/database. Exiting tuples make room for new tuples, etc. If your have to vacuum full / pg_repack your tables on a scheduled bases then I think there is something very wrong with your application. Pg_repack will do more harm in the long run. i.e. the entire time pg_repack is running xmin is frozen thus creating more bloat everywhere else! Bloat is overrated; especially in a transaction system where all your data access patterns should be well defined and not doing full table scans. Just focus on identifying bloated indexes periodically and rebuilding those. There should be no need to vacuum full tables under normal circumstances. |
