On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 09:07:14PM +0530, Siraj G wrote:
> Hello experts!
>
> I am new in the PgSQL domain, so I need assistance in understanding the
> explain plan. I took the plan of a SQL via PgAdmin and it looks like the
> attached one. I am unable to see the numbers that indicate where the heavy
> processing is being done, to determine the IO and cpu processing.
>
> Is this the right way to collect explain plan? If so, how do I interpret
> this? If there is another or a better way to collect this, please let me
> know.
Just run 'explain analyze' and read the text output. Graphs, in my
opinion, hide too much info.
Normal explain looks like:
#v+
QUERY PLAN
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Sort (cost=35.41..35.50 rows=35 width=224) (actual time=0.160..0.162 rows=4 loops=1)
Sort Key: n.nspname, c.relname
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
Buffers: shared hit=15
-> Hash Join (cost=1.09..34.51 rows=35 width=224) (actual time=0.046..0.153 rows=4 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (c.relnamespace = n.oid)
Buffers: shared hit=15
-> Seq Scan on pg_class c (cost=0.00..32.16 rows=70 width=77) (actual time=0.009..0.107 rows=146 loops=1)
Filter: ((relkind = ANY ('{r,p,v,m,S,f,""}'::"char"[])) AND pg_table_is_visible(oid))
Rows Removed by Filter: 280
Buffers: shared hit=14
-> Hash (cost=1.07..1.07 rows=2 width=68) (actual time=0.029..0.029 rows=2 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 9kB
Buffers: shared hit=1
-> Seq Scan on pg_namespace n (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=2 width=68) (actual time=0.013..0.015 rows=2 loops=1)
Filter: ((nspname <> 'pg_catalog'::name) AND (nspname !~ '^pg_toast'::text) AND (nspname <> 'information_schema'::name))
Rows Removed by Filter: 3
Buffers: shared hit=1
Planning:
Buffers: shared hit=9
Planning Time: 0.204 ms
Execution Time: 0.189 ms
(22 rows)
#v-
Best regards,
depesz
