HA Setup Review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Team,

I am looking for some feedback on the HA Setup that we are finalizing for running our business critical workloads.

We are planning to follow this Setup,
https://www.pgpool.net/docs/42/en/html/example-cluster.html
 
  • Basically a 3 node PostgreSQL Cluster, running 3 processes i.e. PostgreSQL DB, PGPool and WatchDog. 
  • These 3 nodes will be distributed across 3 availability zones/data centers for resilience and use a synchronous replication between Primary and Stand-by. 
  • Synchronous option will be Any One, so that the DB availability is not impacted if 1 Stand-by is down for even planned outage i.e. Patching of DB or Virtual Machine. 

We see a lot of benefits of this setup in terms of availability and managing less infrastructure v/s setting up separate machines for PGPool. 

However, I wanted to know if there are any Cons/Downsides of this setup and any suggestion to improve this setup. 

Any views would be highly appreciated.

Thanks & Regards,
Akshay 

Attachment: image.png
Description: PNG image


[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Home]     [Postgresql General]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Postgresql PHP]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Databases]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux