Dears,
Thank you all for your response. Below are the general details about our setup.
Our setup is DC & DR.
On DC: Three nodes(one master, Two replicas) and replication mode is asynchronous between DC.
On DR: One replica and replication mode is asynchronous between DC & DR.
All four nodes have the same configuration such as CPU,RAM and Disks.
In DC no replication & in DR yes it's always replication lag due to this our replication got broken.
The setup runs on on-prem RHEL 7.9 and PG 12.x.
Is there a way to perform an incremental data restore if replication breaks at a certain point? The data size is substantial, and when replication breaks between the DC and DR, it takes 3 to 4 days to rebuild the replica.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 7:23 PM Jwiencek3 <jwiencek3@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Look at using synchronous replication.Sent from my iPadOn Oct 19, 2023, at 5:38 AM, Licio Matos <licio.matos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Veerendra,Is your servers, primary and secondary, the same size? CPU, Memory etc.Licio MatosEm qui., 19 de out. de 2023 às 07:12, Veerendra Pulapa <veerendra.pulapa@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:Hello,
I need some help with a database issue we’re facing. We have a situation where our primary data center and our disaster recovery site are far apart, and this long distance is causing delays in keeping our data synchronized. It’s become a problem as we want our data to be as up-to-date as possible.
Do you have any suggestions for dealing with this kind of situation? We’ve tried a few things, but we’re still struggling with the replication delays caused by the high latency between the sites.
Note: Bandwidth is very low and latency is very high.
I’d appreciate any advice you can provide.
Thanks in advance.Get Outlook for iOS