I do about 2-10 WALs per second. I have a
remote pgbackrest repo, and I do faster WAL archiving using the archive-async=y parameter, which
enables WALs to be archived asynchronously, really speeding it up. I
also increase the archive-push-queue-max=100GB.
For fetching the WALs, like when a standby gets behind and it needs to
read WALs to catch up to get back into SR mode, I increase the size of
the pgBackRest queue on the standby ( archive_get-queue-max
= 100GB).
Both queue max parms are only enabled when archive-async is turned on.
Regards,
Michael Vitale
Nikhil Shetty wrote on 8/6/2023 6:56 AM:
Hi Michael,
May I know what is wal generation rate pm for you? I
may give this a try.
Thanks,
Nikhil
I am using PGbackrest
and I am generating many WALs per second too, and I have no problems
keeping up and I am backing them up remotely.
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 6, 2023, at 3:43 AM, Nikhil Shetty <nikhil.dba04@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I would like to know which backup&restore tools will be better
for scenarios where the database is generating around 400 WALs per
minute.
>
> We are using wal-g but it is not able to keep pace with the wal
generation. We increased the upload streams to 256 but no luck
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil
|
