Re: pglogical performance for copying large table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: srinivas oguri <srinivasoguri7@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pglogical performance for copying large table
From: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:37:28 -0500
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CADfH0ysqqo4zWXxjASOw6GmGjABt=g15Bu-nj76caC8hA2RwSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADfH0ysqqo4zWXxjASOw6GmGjABt=g15Bu-nj76caC8hA2RwSQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 1:30 PM srinivas oguri <srinivasoguri7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have set the parallel processes for logical replication as 12.

What does this mean in terms of parameters? Are all of them being used?

Cheers,

Jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pglogical performance for copying large table
  - From: srinivas oguri

References:
- pglogical performance for copying large table
  - From: srinivas oguri

Prev by Date: Re: pglogical performance for copying large table
Next by Date: Re: pglogical performance for copying large table
Previous by thread: Re: pglogical performance for copying large table
Next by thread: Re: pglogical performance for copying large table
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Home] [Postgresql General] [Postgresql Performance] [Postgresql PHP] [Postgresql Jobs] [PHP Users] [PHP Databases] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux