> On Nov 1, 2022, at 7:34 AM, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Right. And how does that constitute data loss? If you start the primary again, the transaction > will be replicated just fine. Now if you call it *data delay*, I would agree. It comes down to this: there is no magic. Replication is async with delay between primary & secondary, or replication is synchronous with the delay visible to clients. Transaction commit completes, or it doesn't. And so on.
