Re: Vacuum behaviour for replicated nodes with pglogical (postgres 10)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dirk Krautschick <Dirk.Krautschick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Vacuum behaviour for replicated nodes with pglogical (postgres 10)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:59:13 +0200
In-reply-to: <ZRAP278MB0254E1B58BE392B3C6B40FA3E9199@ZRAP278MB0254.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <ZRAP278MB0254E1B58BE392B3C6B40FA3E9199@ZRAP278MB0254.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0

On 24.03.22 09:39, Dirk Krautschick wrote:

should I expect the same vacuum behaviour on both nodes replicated withpglogical
if both nodes have the very same autovacuum settings?
The insert, update, delete do have the same affect on the threshold onstandby side, right?


Yes, it should roughly be the same.

References:
- Vacuum behaviour for replicated nodes with pglogical (postgres 10)
  - From: Dirk Krautschick

Prev by Date: RE: Re: About Unicode IVS
Next by Date: WAL & ZFS
Previous by thread: Vacuum behaviour for replicated nodes with pglogical (postgres 10)
Next by thread: Avoid Wraparound Failures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Home] [Postgresql General] [Postgresql Performance] [Postgresql PHP] [Postgresql Jobs] [PHP Users] [PHP Databases] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux