Re: Incremental Postgres database backup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/7/2022 09:57, Ron wrote:
On 3/7/22 08:30, Karl Denninger wrote:
[snip]

The other obvious option is online replication.


Replication is not a backup solution!!!!!

That's true, but once you have replication set up you have a local staging source against which to take backups that does not require Internet bandwidth, and thus makes solving the problem MUCH easier.

Getting the I/O from the backup process off the production machine(s) is frequently a good decision.  Online replication does this and moves the locus of your backup away from the online production environment.

If that's not material simply using existing tools (e.g. pgbackrest) does the job all by itself, but if so using replication to get the data where its convenient to use a tool such as pgbackrest absolutely works, separates the I/O load away from the production environment and opens up using block-level or filesystem-level backup tools (e.g. ZFS) as well since even if the database spans a snapshot atomic coherence boundary (which otherwise makes doing that unsafe) you can shut the replicated slave down, take said snapshots and restart it without implicating accessibility to the database.

--
Karl Denninger
karl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Market Ticker
[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Home]     [Postgresql General]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Postgresql PHP]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Databases]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux