Tom Lane wrote: [dd] > The specific point that depesz was responding to in that blog > was the 64K-ish limit on rangetable entries in a query. That is > a thing, as he could have shown by using queries that weren't > amenable to plan-time pruning. (It's also an ex-thing, having > been fixed for v15 [1]; but that doesn't help you today.) > Now, if you use no queries that can't be pruned to a few > partitions, then it's academic for you. The table will be partitioned `BY LIST (customer_id)` which is a unique index. All queries will be using this index so no query should ever have to use more than 1 partition. This means basically I'm OK? -- Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE http://vas.tomsk.ru/ 2:5005/49@fidonet
