Re: Is file system replication sufficient to recovery?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK plain old RAID will not protect 
> you against any scenario except failure of a single disk.  It certainly
> won't do anything to help you revert to a prior database state.

File System (Block Device) Replication

A modified version of shared hardware functionality is file system replication, where all changes to a file system are mirrored to a file system residing on another computer. The only restriction is that the mirroring must be done in a way that ensures the standby server has a consistent copy of the file system — specifically, writes to the standby must be done in the same order as those on the primary. DRBD is a popular file system replication solution for Linux.

DRBD seems to work similar to RAID but over network, but I might be wrong. 

An alternative file-system backup approach is to make a consistent snapshot of the data directory, if the file system supports that functionality (and you are willing to trust that it is implemented correctly). 
> The typical procedure is to make a frozen snapshot of the volume containing the database


So could the following backup architecture make sense? 
1. Periodic snapshots using EBS mechanism (to get consistent snapshots). 
2. Periodic pg_basebackup + WAL file archiving ( to allow reverting to a previous step if we e.g. mistakenly drop a table). 

Thanks,
Tom
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 12:52 PM Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tom Korach <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> What do you mean exactly by "file-system replication"?

> RAID1 setup (specifically, between two disks or EBS volumes [on AWS]),
> using LVM.

Maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK plain old RAID will not protect
you against any scenario except failure of a single disk.  It certainly
won't do anything to help you revert to a prior database state.

The docs page I pointed you to is part of a chapter that lays out all
the backup methods the PG community considers reliable.  I strongly
suggest sticking to one of those and not trying to take shortcuts.
(The following chapter on high-availability setups is relevant
reading as well.)

                        regards, tom lane

[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Home]     [Postgresql General]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Postgresql PHP]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Databases]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux