Re: Very slow 101-feeling design/query..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/10/21 4:53 PM, Wells Oliver wrote:
This feels very 101 but I feel like it should be much faster:

A table "joints" with a PK of play_uuid, target_id, joint_seq, joint_timestamp.

"joints" is partitioned using RANGE on joint_timestamp for monthly partitions 1/1 - 2/1, 2-1 - 3/1, etc.

"joints" has an FK where play_uuid refers to table "plays" and column "play_uuid" where "play_uuid" is the PK.

"plays" additionally has an indexed column game_id.

"joints" has 1133,932,391 rows across 12 monthly partitions for 2021, and "plays has 585,627 rows. We made a view called "vw_joints" which just does:

SELECT * FROM joints JOIN plays USING (play_id);

Then doing:

SELECT DISTINCT game_id FROM vw_joints

Takes 35-45 minutes. Which seems nuts. We do this kind of design in a few different plays to normalize things, but it comes at the cost of these agonizingly slow (and seemingly dead simple) qeuries.

Is there any optimization to do here beyond flattening table and de-normalizing data? Is the partitioning causing a slowness here? I feel like partitioning is creating some difficulty...

What Postgresql version?

What does the query plan look like?

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.





[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Home]     [Postgresql General]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Postgresql PHP]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Databases]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux