On Saturday, November 27th, 2021 at 17:12, Achilleas Mantzios <achill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Στις 27/11/21 7:01 μ.μ., ο/η SQL Padawan έγραψε: > > > Postgres-XL is not exactly a replication solution but it is ACID compliant and it doesn't have problem with sequences. It is a decent high availability solution. More information is available here: https://www.postgres-xl.org/ > > > > > > It hasn't moved in almost 3 years? A Marie-Céleste project? > You know that "free" in software is one thing and "free" beer another. Yes of course - and I'm not criticising or pointing fingers at anyone involved in that project. It's just that it has been **my experience** that software always has issues - esp. a piece of distributed software whose foundation is also v. complex. PostgreSQL 10 is at version 19 - the XL project hasn't moved since 10.1 - doesn't inspire confidence in me anyway - and I personally would be very hesitant about recommending what is, AFAICS, abandon-ware. YMMV - with all respect, SQLP!
