On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 17:08, Holger Jakobs <holger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 24. November 2021 18:06:45 MEZ schrieb Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 14:03, MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> You do understand that multi-master replication is not acid-compliant > >> and the implications of that, right? It only works well for "read > >> globally, write locally" scenarios. > > > >This isn't true. > > > >Async multi-master has performance advantages, but some drawbacks. But > >systems such as BDR3 allow multiple modes of operation that overcome > >these perceived issues. > > > > Are you aware that the original poster asked for open source solutions? Yes, I read that, which is why I didn't reply to the OP. My response was to the statement about "multi-master replication". > Of course, BDR3 is a great tool. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
