Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok I also tried that Tom. Psql returned “Did not find any relations named “‘.temp_my_table_global”

Sent from my iPad

> On Nov 2, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> John Scalia <jayknowsunix@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> While I’m waiting for my devs to confirm the first table that I partitioned is working correctly, I started working on second of three that I need to do. So, I added the code to end of my original script, but there was a typo in it. Now, as this code runs in a transaction block, so I don’t think anything it created should actually be present in the database, but on a subsequent rerunning, I got an error that one of the partition tables actually exists already. However, I cannot see it, nor drop it from the server. The error in the script is: relation “temp_my_second_table_global” already exists, but the system cannot see it in order to drop it, saying “temp_my_second_table_global” does not exist. That’s really a catch-22. Is there a system table where I can look and maybe drop it from there directly?
> 
> Kinda sounds like a confusion over search_path, ie script is creating
> table in some schema that's not in your interactive search path?
> 
> In psql, try
>   \d *.temp_my_second_table_global
> to see instances of temp_my_second_table_global in all schemas.
> 
>            regards, tom lane






[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux