> On Jul 7, 2020, at 7:14 PM, Wells Oliver <wells.oliver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sorry guys, it works exactly the way I want, just wanted to suppress its output when called for thousands of rows. Apologies if I wasn't clear enough.
It seems that it doesn't work the way you want, because it can output thousands of rows ;-)
You all may want to re-read the original post before commenting further. I’m finding nothing particularly unusual about this setup. Sure, multiple delete using commands or cascade delete may be a bit more performant if the api described in the OP is sufficiently fast it is definitely the easiest to program against.
David J.
