Re: Performance of SELECT directly and from application

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Performance of SELECT directly and from application
From: Thomas Kellerer <shammat@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:58:37 +0200
In-reply-to: <7ee1fb6b-b1d2-f69b-7a28-e37c32c696fc@vit.de>
References: <404eece7-44b3-bbb4-177a-ff955d10e7e6@vit.de> <9dda6f8fa24bb80c7456a8439cba0b4adf2b8ae4.camel@cybertec.at> <7ee1fb6b-b1d2-f69b-7a28-e37c32c696fc@vit.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666

Jessica Holle schrieb am 25.06.2020 um 13:13:
> I'm not allowed to post the plan until it is anonymized.

You can use https://explain.depesz.com/ to share your plan which has an option to automatically obfuscate the table names

References:
- Performance of SELECT directly and from application
  - From: Jessica Holle
- Re: Performance of SELECT directly and from application
  - From: Laurenz Albe
- Re: Performance of SELECT directly and from application
  - From: Jessica Holle

Prev by Date: Re: Performance of SELECT directly and from application
Next by Date: using regular expression queries with regular expression indexes
Previous by thread: Re: Performance of SELECT directly and from application
Next by thread: Re: Performance of SELECT directly and from application
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux