Ron <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 12/20/19 8:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> The rule is that a range partition from A to B covers values A <= X < B. > If I were to ask to count *from* 1 *to* 100, you'd count from 1 to 100, > *not* 1 to 99. Who decided to arbitrarily break a grammatical rule we > (native English speakers, and I bet everyone else, too) all learn as > children, causing all sorts of needless confusion and breakage? This rule breaks fewer things than a rule of A <= X <= B would. In particular, for more-or-less-continuous values like float8s or timestamps, you really really don't want to have to write down the-last-possible-value-before-the-start-of-the-next-partition. regards, tom lane