Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mariel Cherkassky <mariel.cherkassky@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
From: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 10:22:04 -0500
Cc: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA+t6e1n1oO2pJLJqPYtt_hZiQhWakF54D9ifXm4403ij3G9LLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+t6e1n1oO2pJLJqPYtt_hZiQhWakF54D9ifXm4403ij3G9LLw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 7:53 AM Mariel Cherkassky <mariel.cherkassky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The second machine is a clone of the first one + db upgrade to 12 beta 3 (Yes I'm aware 12.1 was released).

So then fix it. Why spend time investigating obsolete software? Was 12Beta3 compiled with --enable-cassert?

Cheers,

Jeff

References:
- performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
  - From: Mariel Cherkassky

Prev by Date: Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
Next by Date: Re: Trouble setting up Streaming Replication with Barman
Previous by thread: Re: performance degredation after upgrade from 9.6 to 12
Next by thread: No result when selecting attstattarget from pg_attribute
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux