Re: Important lag in replication streaming between master and standby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:21 PM Mai Peng <maily.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’ve got several times this error : "requested WAL segment 000000020000A01A0000004F has already been remove". I think it’s due to the lag between our master in EU zone and our standby in US zone.
> How could we configure Postgres to handle this issue?

As others already stated, you can use either wal_keep_segments or
replication_slots with advantages and drawbacks on both sides. One
thing to point out, also, since you did not provide a lot of
information, is that if you have another slave consuming wals, it
could remove (archive_cleanup) segments ignoring other slaves.

Personally, I would go for a replication slot and see if the lag can
be kept under control (i.e., the pg_wal directory does not grow too
much).

Luca






[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux