Greetings, * Thorsten Schöning (tschoening@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > I would just like to know if it's a real option to not need an > additional host or if that would be a waste of time most likely. Doesn't that provide a CIFS network share that you could then mount..? Or maybe an iSCSI LUN that you could mount to your database server? Seems like having a network mount and then using something which works with that kind of network mount would be a good option (pgbackrest supports CIFS mounts explicitly, I'm not sure about other tools). Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
