are there any expectations about pg indexes having prefix compression?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: are there any expectations about pg indexes having prefix compression?
From
: Alexandre hadjinlian guerra <alexhguerra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 02:35:07 -0300
Hi
i cant find any info about PG using btree prefix compression or dictionary based compression. May i ask the status for these features?
Thanks
Follow-Ups
:
Re: are there any expectations about pg indexes having prefix compression?
From:
Peter Eisentraut
Re: are there any expectations about pg indexes having prefix compression?
From:
Peter Geoghegan
Prev by Date:
Re: pgsql 8.3 : force FK (and consequently ON DELETE CASCADE) to be run under session_replication_role TO 'replica'
Next by Date:
When it's really necessary to enable WAR archiving in case of low level backups?
Previous by thread:
pgsql 8.3 : force FK (and consequently ON DELETE CASCADE) to be run under session_replication_role TO 'replica'
Next by thread:
Re: are there any expectations about pg indexes having prefix compression?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Virtualization Tools]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Questions]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
