Yes. Sorry for that.
EXPLAIN SELECT sequence_name AS relname, sequence_schema AS schemaname FROM information_schema.sequences WHERE sequence_schema NOT LIKE 'pg\_%' AND sequence_schema != 'information_schema'; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=28.78..44.52 rows=1 width=64) -> Nested Loop (cost=28.78..31.03 rows=1 width=132) -> Hash Join (cost=28.78..30.18 rows=1 width=72) Hash Cond: (s.seqrelid = c.oid) -> Seq Scan on pg_sequence s (cost=0.00..1.40 rows=40 width=4) -> Hash (cost=28.56..28.56 rows=22 width=72) -> Seq Scan on pg_class c (cost=0.00..28.56 rows=22 width=72) Filter: ((pg_has_role(relowner, 'USAGE'::text) OR has_sequence_privilege(oid, 'SELECT, UPDATE, USAGE'::text)) AND (relkind = 'S'::"char")) -> Index Scan using pg_namespace_oid_index on pg_namespace nc (cost=0.00..0.57 rows=1 width=68) Index Cond: (oid = c.relnamespace) Filter: ((NOT pg_is_other_temp_schema(oid)) AND (((nspname)::information_schema.sql_identifier)::text !~~ 'pg\_%'::text) AND (((nspname)::information_schema.sql_identifier)::text <> 'information_schema'::text)) -> Index Scan using pg_depend_depender_index on pg_depend (cost=0.00..6.75 rows=1 width=4) Index Cond: ((classid = ''::oid) AND (objid = c.oid)) Filter: (deptype = 'i'::"char") (14 rows)
Maybe, as this does not happen with another instance. Thanks, Axel PS: The origin of the query is here: --- PGP-Key:29E99DD6 ☀ computing @ chaos claudius |