Re: Partitioning with foreign tables.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 

If I insert a row to partitioned table which is in local, a partitioned table’s constraints should work. If I add a constraint on a partitioned table, I should be make sure I can not insert a row which is out of partitioned table’s constraints. But I could. I think, partitioned table’s constraints should work with regard to environment. If I work on local, constraints work for local tables and should not consider other environment’s constraints.



To be more clear, I would like to add EXPLAIN ANALYZE script.

artemis=# explain (analyze,verbose) insert into students values(2,'another name');
                                               QUERY PLAN                            
                 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
 Insert on public.students  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=1.536..1.53
9 rows=0 loops=1)
   Remote SQL: INSERT INTO public.students(id, name) VALUES ($1, $2)
   ->  Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.005..0.013 rows=1 loop
s=1)
         Output: 2, 'another name'::character varying
 Planning time: 0.063 ms
 Execution time: 2.877 ms
(6 rows)

We use push-down for INSERT statement but I think constraints should be checked before sending SQL statements then INSERT statements should be perform.

If it's nature, why do we require to add unused constraint for FDW side only?

--
Gunce Kaya


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux