On 2018-03-01 18:32:08 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I pushed my proposed fix all the way back to 9.3. > > As I said earlier, I couldn't detect a bug of the sort you describe: > > a) as I argued in my previous email, no tuple earlier than the > relfreezexid should survive, because 9.2 did remove those when > freezing the table. You're right, I think I was thinking of the < 9.3.x case where multixacts weren't removed at all. Greetings, Andres Freund
