RE: PostgreSQL recovery file syntax, ver 8.4 vs ver 9.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I actually need the log shipping so I can decide whether or not I want the
standby to accept data from the master (In case of master corruption).  I
have clients on ver 8.4 and 9.5 so I'm trying to figure out if I can share
config settings between clients.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter.eisentraut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 4:44 PM
To: Telium Technical Support <support@xxxxxxxxx>;
pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL recovery file syntax, ver 8.4 vs ver 9.5

On 2/20/18 15:44, Telium Technical Support wrote:
> In postgreSQL version 8.4 it seems that you can place the db server 
> into warm standby mode with the following setting in recovery.conf
> 
>     restore_command = 'pg_standby archiveDir %f %p %r'
> 
> In postgreSQL version 9.5 I see the same option, but I also see what 
> appears to be an alternative syntax in recovery.conf:
> 
>    standby_mode = (boolean)
>    trigger_file = (string)
> 
> So is this new syntax an alternative to the old syntax (both are 
> accepted by PGSQL)? Any benefit to the new syntax?
> 
> Does the new syntax mean that I can use the restore_command setting as 
> well (to use my own copy command)?

A lot has changed between 8.4 and 9.5.  Hot standby, streaming replication,
replication slots, and so on.  You can continue to use pg_standby, but the
new facilities are better in many ways.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services






[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux