Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Database Error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ferrell, Denise D CTR NSWCDD, H11
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 9:35 AM
To: pgsql-admin
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re:  Database Error
Importance: High

I've ran the vacuum freeze which corrected some issues but now I'm getting the following WARNING:

"terminating connection because of crash of another server process
"relation "<table_name>" page 1601779 is uninitialized --- fixing"


Is there something else that is needed besides the VACUUM FREEZE?

Thank you in advance,
Denise Ferrell


-----Original Message-----
From: Ferrell, Denise D CTR NSWCDD, H11 
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 2:00 PM
To: 'Don Seiler'
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re:  Database Error

Got it!

Is there a way to extent the max number for these?

d

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Seiler [mailto:don@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 12:32 PM
To: Ferrell, Denise D CTR NSWCDD, H11
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re:  Database Error

Make sure you are using the FREEZE option. That is what resets the transaction IDs (which is the problem you're seeing).

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Ferrell, Denise D CTR NSWCDD, H11 <denise.ferrell.ctr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


	Thank you again for the information.  I'm currently in and running a full vacuum.
	
	Denise
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Don Seiler
	Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 10:42 AM
	To: Ferrell, Denise D CTR NSWCDD, H11
	Cc: pgsql-admin
	Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re:  Database Error
	
	
	On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Ferrell, Denise D CTR NSWCDD, H11 <denise.ferrell.ctr@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
	
	
	        Using PostgreSQL v9.3 on RedHat platform.
	
	        Last week the VM that the database resides on ran out of space...since that time after bringing the service back on-line getting intermittent connection issues.
	
	        Today I'm receiving the following.
	
	        ERROR:  database is not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss in database "----"
	        HINT:  Stop the postmaster and use a standalone backend to vacuum that database.
	        You might also need to commit or roll back old prepared transactions.
	
	
	
	Sounds like you'll need to restart the DB in single-user mode and run a VACUUM FREEZE on the whole thing.
	
	Here's a good read on a similar incident: https://blog.sentry.io/2015/07/23/transaction-id-wraparound-in-postgres.html <https://blog.sentry.io/2015/07/23/transaction-id-wraparound-in-postgres.html> 
	
	--
	
	Don Seiler
	www.seiler.us
	




-- 

Don Seiler
www.seiler.us

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux