John Scalia <jayknowsunix@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi all, > > I've been asked to make our setup a little more secure. So, I thought > I would restrict which servers could replicate from our primary. > However, it does not appear that 9.6.3 can use a FQDN entry for this > parameter. Plus, our hostnames include "-" characters, and that seems > to break the system as well. Shouldn't synchronous_standby_names > accept a FQDN with a dot or a dash in the hostname or is this maybe a > bug? (Flame suit on) HBA file is where you restrict access based on IP/netmask or DNS names. synchronous_standby_names has nothing whatsoever to do with this. HTH > -- > Jay > > -- Jerry Sievers Postgres DBA/Development Consulting e: postgres.consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx p: 312.241.7800 -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
