Re: Failover with a tertiary read-only secondary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Hammerman, Joseph <JosephHammerman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  1. Not a bad idea, but that only delays the necessity of a resync until the next failover…. Unless I’m missing something?
I've used cascading replication extensively over the past few years and rarely had to resync a downstream replica. The several thousand Postgres clusters I'm administering now are almost exclusively set up with the primary replica streaming from the master and the master shipping WALs to the secondary replica in DR data centre, so I can't test any cascading replication promotions at the moment. My suggestion is to test your replication setup in a cascade and see what happens, I don't expect you'll need to resync. If you do, report back with how you've set up your replication settings.


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux