Re: Help with bad performance with synchronous commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Lazaro Garcia <lazaro3487@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Help with bad performance with synchronous commit
From: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:57:01 -0700
Cc: "pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <001f01d2aa2d$1f9f27a0$5edd76e0$@gmail.com>
References: <001f01d2aa2d$1f9f27a0$5edd76e0$@gmail.com>

On Friday, March 31, 2017, Lazaro Garcia <lazaro3487@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have runned the same test in other machines with less RAM and CPU and the results are always better than this:

Which leaves questions about the storage device unanswered - and you are using a disk-writing query.

David J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help with bad performance with synchronous commit
  - From: Lazaro Garcia

References:
- Help with bad performance with synchronous commit
  - From: Lazaro Garcia

Prev by Date: Help with bad performance with synchronous commit
Next by Date: Failover with a tertiary read-only secondary
Previous by thread: Help with bad performance with synchronous commit
Next by thread: Re: Help with bad performance with synchronous commit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux